History of Total order/Talk
HomePage
|
Recent Changes
|
Preferences
Revision 10
. . August 17, 2001 9:20 pm by
AxelBoldt
Revision 9
. . August 17, 2001 8:24 pm by
Zundark
Revision 8
. .
(edit)
August 17, 2001 7:23 pm by
Jan Hidders
Revision 7
. . August 17, 2001 7:18 pm by
Jan Hidders
Revision 6
. . August 17, 2001 6:54 pm by
Zundark
Revision 5
. . August 17, 2001 6:14 pm by
Jan Hidders
['''Q''' smallest dense total-ordered set?]
Revision 4
. . August 17, 2001 1:54 am by
AxelBoldt
[rationals smallest dense total order??]
Revision 3
. . August 16, 2001 7:40 pm by
AxelBoldt
Revision 2
. . August 16, 2001 7:21 pm by
Jan Hidders
[connected?]
Revision 1
. . August 14, 2001 3:23 am by
AxelBoldt
Difference (from prior major revision)
(no other diffs)
Added: 24a25,28
I agree with everything that was said above. I guess one could justify the statement about the rationals after all.
I also like totally ordered better. --
AxelBoldt