[Home]History of Total order/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 10 . . August 17, 2001 9:20 pm by AxelBoldt
Revision 9 . . August 17, 2001 8:24 pm by Zundark
Revision 8 . . (edit) August 17, 2001 7:23 pm by Jan Hidders
Revision 7 . . August 17, 2001 7:18 pm by Jan Hidders
Revision 6 . . August 17, 2001 6:54 pm by Zundark
Revision 5 . . August 17, 2001 6:14 pm by Jan Hidders ['''Q''' smallest dense total-ordered set?]
Revision 4 . . August 17, 2001 1:54 am by AxelBoldt [rationals smallest dense total order??]
Revision 3 . . August 16, 2001 7:40 pm by AxelBoldt
Revision 2 . . August 16, 2001 7:21 pm by Jan Hidders [connected?]
Revision 1 . . August 14, 2001 3:23 am by AxelBoldt
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 24a25,28



I agree with everything that was said above. I guess one could justify the statement about the rationals after all.
I also like totally ordered better. --AxelBoldt

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: