History of The ontological argument/Talk

Difference (from prior major revision) (author diff)

Changed: 34c34

:Er, no, I don't think a lot of stuff on Wikipedia is perfectly unbiased; but I think a lot of it makes a reasonable first pass at being so. Almost all of these articles need a lot more work. This is a work-in-progress (which is one of the things that makes Wikipedia so much fun to work on). The ontological argument, though, as I said on Larrys Text, doesn't even make a reasonable first pass at being so. :-) By the way, the first thing you might do is help to revise the ontological argument. It obviously does need revision. I thought you did an excellent job with the rationality of atheism. --LMS

	Revision 7 . . July 17, 2001 11:51 am by Larry Sanger
	Revision 6 . . July 17, 2001 11:50 am by Larry Sanger
	Revision 5 . . July 17, 2001 11:49 am by Larry Sanger
	Revision 4 . . July 17, 2001 11:48 am by Larry Sanger
	Revision 3 . . July 17, 2001 11:45 am by Larry Sanger
	Revision 2 . . July 17, 2001 4:05 am by Mark Christensen [Comments and questions ]
	Revision 1 . . June 3, 2001 1:28 am by Andre Engels