[Home]History of Tactical voting/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 4 . . October 25, 2001 2:19 am by (logged).64.31.xxx
Revision 3 . . October 24, 2001 7:36 am by (logged).9.128.xxx [some criticisms]
Revision 2 . . October 24, 2001 4:58 am by (logged).64.31.xxx
Revision 1 . . September 17, 2001 12:36 am by DanKeshet
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 13c13,19
Secondly, the article is a little too technical, too quickly. Without some mathematical background, I think you'd struggle to get much useful out of it. --Robert Merkel
:I didn't mean to make a value judgment there; I was just copying from the academic literature. (As a frequent campaign activist, I find it amusing that anybody would call me "elite".) I've changed it to something I hope will be more palatable.

Secondly, the article is a little too technical, too quickly. Without some mathematical background, I think you'd struggle to get much useful out of it. --Robert Merkel

:I'll try to factor out the game-theory discussion into appropriate pages (like the G-S theorem page) and leave this page as an overview of how tactical voting occurs in real-life elections.

:Incidentally, I've just started reading the academic literature on voting systems, and I'm now embarrassed at all the pages I've put up from the activist perspective. --DanKeshet

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: