[Home]History of Superfetation/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 3 . . December 5, 2001 3:58 am by MichaelTinkler
Revision 2 . . December 5, 2001 3:43 am by Josh Grosse
Revision 1 . . December 4, 2001 10:27 pm by (logged).153.24.xxx [manning, I think you should be blunter.]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 3a4,5

O.K. On the other hand, just because some dictionaries practice non-interventionist descriptive linguistics is no need for us to pretend that the word had an -o- in it. Let's explain why they're - ummm - misguided? Not following best spelling-practices? Wrong? --MichaelTinkler, who is trying to not be a pedant and failing.

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: