[Home]History of String/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 7 . . August 27, 2001 8:07 am by Robbe [delete implemented discussion]
Revision 6 . . August 21, 2001 4:46 am by Hornlo [ok]
Revision 5 . . (edit) August 20, 2001 10:53 pm by Drj [please edit.]
Revision 4 . . August 20, 2001 9:41 pm by AxelBoldt
Revision 3 . . August 20, 2001 9:02 am by Hornlo [replace first paragraph?]
Revision 2 . . (edit) August 3, 2001 11:25 pm by Drj [string theory]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 7c7
The first paragraph seems too "busy" to me. What about replacing it with something like this?
Also, I think the usage in computing theory could be expanded in its own paragraph: one starts with a finite alphabet, then considers all finite sequences consisting of letters from that alphabet (including the empty string) and defines concatentation of strings. The set of string with concatentation is then a monoid.

Removed: 9,17d8
:A string (or string of characters) is a data type used in most programming languages to represent text, and is the focus of this article.

:The computing term string is also used in a broader sense to group a sequence of entities; for example, tokens in a language grammar, or a sequence of states in automata. See the theory of computation.



This is a lot better. Also, I think the usage in computing theory could be expanded in its own paragraph: one starts with a finite alphabet, then considers all finite sequences consisting of letters from that alphabet (including the empty string) and defines concatentation of strings. The set of string with concatentation is then a monoid.



I think I wrote most the current paragraph and I agree your rewrite is better. Just do it! --drj

Changed: 19c10
Ok, I'll move my text to the main article. I won't try to expand the second paragraph; I'm inclined to leave that to the computation article, or to whoever can concisely expand it without detracting from the rest of the page. --loh
I won't try to expand the second paragraph; I'm inclined to leave that to the computation article, or to whoever can concisely expand it without detracting from the rest of the page. --loh

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: