History of Neutral point of view

Difference (from prior major revision) (author diff)

Added: 16a17,25

Added by GregLindahl:
<<
If you don't think a view is valid, i.e. you don't think any credible person holds that view, feel free to simply delete it, and demand that the person who added those words to the article prove to you that credible people hold that view. The burden of proof is always on the other person. This is known as "Taw's corollary to NPOV", and applies to any statement like "some people believe X".
>>

I find the above comment quite upsetting. Its position in the document causes others' statements to be easily misread and it is quite plainly an attempt to make a specific person look absurd. -- Taral

	Revision 41 . . December 10, 2001 3:35 am by Taral [Comments on Greg's addition]
	Revision 40 . . December 10, 2001 3:34 am by Taral [Moving text to /Talk]
	Revision 39 . . (edit) December 10, 2001 3:08 am by GregLindahl
	Revision 38 . . (edit) December 10, 2001 3:06 am by GregLindahl
	Revision 37 . . December 10, 2001 3:04 am by GregLindahl [Taw's contribution to NPOV: if you don't think a view is credible, you are free to delete it.]
	Revision 36 . . December 8, 2001 6:16 am by Dan [alternate terminology]
	Revision 35 . . December 7, 2001 3:11 pm by (logged).21.195.xxx
	Revision 34 . . November 23, 2001 6:01 pm by Juuitchan
	Revision 33 . . November 11, 2001 1:23 am by Red Bowen [Example added]