[Home]History of Logical fallacy/No true Scotsman

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 9 . . December 15, 2001 10:30 am by Alex Kennedy [Sorry, but the term "No True Scotsman Fallacy" doesn't exist as an official term, either.]
Revision 8 . . December 15, 2001 8:01 am by AxelBoldt [I don't think the term "No true Scotsman argument" exists.]
Revision 7 . . December 15, 2001 6:41 am by (logged).128.91.xxx
Revision 6 . . December 15, 2001 6:26 am by The Epopt [no true demagogue would let that stand in his way!]
Revision 5 . . (edit) December 15, 2001 3:50 am by Zundark [fix /Talk link]
Revision 4 . . (edit) December 15, 2001 3:46 am by Alex Kennedy
Revision 3 . . December 15, 2001 3:46 am by Alex Kennedy [No True Scotsman is not necessarily a fallacy - see /talk]
Revision 2 . . November 29, 2001 1:13 am by AxelBoldt [+religious atrocities]
Revision 1 . . November 29, 2001 12:59 am by The Epopt [moved to sub-page]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 1c1
The "No true Scotsman" fallacy is an argument of the form:
The "No true Scotsman" argument is an argument of the form:

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: