History of Hate speech/talk

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 6a7,9

You are misunderstanding the complaint: This is a perfectly valid topic - but as presented it is not an article - it is a personal essay with a bunch of questions. Encyclopedia articles should not be written in first or even second person, nor should they present opinions. Hate speech is a well documented phenomonon, and there are specific laws against it in many countries. Research and documentation of such laws, examples of legal cases and other specific instances, and notes on the relationship to propaganda and other topics would make an extremely useful article. This is not something I find interesting myself, hence I choose not to get involved, but hopefully my suggestions will provoke someone to action - MMGB

	Revision 7 . . December 4, 2001 5:40 am by (logged).210.232.xxx [valid topic, bad article]
	Revision 6 . . (edit) December 4, 2001 5:39 am by (logged).191.188.xxx
	Revision 5 . . December 4, 2001 5:37 am by (logged).191.188.xxx [Entries vs discussion]
	Revision 4 . . December 4, 2001 5:37 am by (logged).191.188.xxx [Entries vs discussion]
	Revision 3 . . (edit) December 4, 2001 5:36 am by (logged).191.188.xxx
	Revision 2 . . December 4, 2001 5:35 am by Ed Poor
	Revision 1 . . December 4, 2001 5:32 am by Ed Poor [It is, too, a topic]