[Home]History of Fantasy authors/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 2 . . October 1, 2001 5:34 am by Ansible [Harry Potter is fantasy, which isn't limiting...]
Revision 1 . . October 1, 2001 1:39 am by J Hofmann Kemp
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 4a5,10


I tend to think of 'fantasy' as any novel that unapolegetically violates then-current scientific knowledge. So anything that has magic or magical beasts I lump into this category. Harry Potter is definitely in this category (and others too).

This is opposed to science fiction, which at least tries to wedge in new laws of physics (or what have you) in a non-contradictory fashion. I can't, for example, conclusively disprove that hyperspace doesn't exist, because maybe we don't have the technology to interact with it yet.

Of course, it's this kind of thinking that causes me to lump most of what's in the SF category now into another category, like 'futuristic fantasy', since most SF authors don't have a firm enough grasp of current scientific knowledge. To each his own. -- ansible

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: