[Home]History of English language/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 38 . . November 19, 2001 12:53 am by (logged).41.232.xxx [Removed request for "rhotic" article: article exists]
Revision 37 . . November 19, 2001 12:53 am by (logged).41.232.xxx [Removed request for "rhotic" article]
Revision 36 . . November 19, 2001 12:31 am by Egern
Revision 35 . . November 18, 2001 8:45 pm by ManningBartlett
Revision 34 . . November 11, 2001 5:14 am by Aristotle
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (author diff)

Changed: 156c156
I essentially agree with you, but I do think that the spoken languages can be grouped if we wanted to. The spoken variants of Canadian English and American English, for example, are similar enough that they could get grouped into the same category. Somewhere in one of the Talk sections of the myriad English language articles, I posted a quote from the book "The World's Major Languages" that grouped the spoken language into two broad cateogires. However, I don't have any great attachment to creating articles on these broad spoken categories of the language, which are probably somewhat vague. --Egern.
I essentially agree with you, but I do think that the spoken languages can be grouped if we wanted to. The spoken variants of Canadian English and American English, for example, are similar enough that they could get grouped into the same category. Somewhere in one of the Talk sections of the myriad English language articles, I posted a quote from the book "The World's Major Languages" that grouped the spoken language into two broad cateogires. However, I don't have any great attachment to creating articles on these broad spoken categories of the language, which are probably somewhat vague. --Egern.

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: