[Home]History of Dracula/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 10 . . October 27, 2001 6:01 am by Sjc
Revision 9 . . October 27, 2001 3:57 am by Corvus13
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Removed: 21d20


Added: 23a23,24
But Carmilla is definitely the most interesting... sjc


Added: 25a27,28

Oh dear, Elizabeth Miller really does have you wound up, doesn't she? Her viewpoint is kind of unique amongst scholars.... It is just a theory; there are many other arguments against her point of view. There are 3 threads to the source of Dracula: 1. Irish folk-myth (some of the Sidhe were thought to drink human blood; 2. Carmilla by Sheridan le Fanu and 3. (and problematically from Ms Miller's viewpoint) [Vlad Tepes]?. 1 and 2 are not disputed by Ms Miller. Her argument definitely substantiates Carmilla as a source. But. Her arguments are based upon a number of assumptions, and while they are intellectually coherent, many of them are circumstantial. We will never know for sure. sjc

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: