Revision 153 . . December 18, 2001 2:04 am by Ed Poor [okay, so I'll move the 'difficult to say' sentence up]
Revision 152 . . December 18, 2001 2:04 am by Ed Poor [okay, so I'll move the 'difficult to say' sentence up]
Revision 151 . . December 18, 2001 2:00 am by Simon J Kissane [creationism contradicts Darwinian evolution by definition... if you fully and completely accept Darwinian evolution, you are not a creationist]
Revision 150 . . December 18, 2001 1:46 am by Ed Poor [in contradiction to => generally held to contradict ]
Revision 149 . . (edit) December 15, 2001 7:28 am by AxelBoldt
Revision 148 . . December 15, 2001 6:38 am by (logged).253.39.xxx [Mentioned Gosse and the Omphalos]
Revision 147 . . December 15, 2001 3:03 am by Ed Poor [copy edit, combined and shortened 2 sentences]
Revision 146 . . December 14, 2001 9:08 am by Ed Poor [added links]
Revision 145 . . December 14, 2001 2:15 am by Larry Sanger [Adding a question I hope someone will finally answer.]
Revision 144 . . December 14, 2001 2:14 am by Larry Sanger [Adding bit about cosmogony. Also "creationism" need not be capitalized.]
Revision 143 . . December 14, 2001 2:03 am by AxelBoldt [Hindus also have gods.]
Revision 142 . . December 14, 2001 2:03 am by AxelBoldt [Hindus also have gods.]
Revision 141 . . December 14, 2001 2:03 am by AxelBoldt [Hindus also have gods.]
Revision 140 . . December 14, 2001 1:13 am by Ed Poor [copy edit first para]
Revision 139 . . December 13, 2001 3:14 pm by Eloquence [added link to talkorigins.org]
Revision 138 . . December 6, 2001 3:38 am by (logged).158.193.xxx
Revision 137 . . December 5, 2001 11:43 pm by (logged).109.250.xxx [changed "Others" to "Other people", to make sure it's not understood as "Other creationists"]
Revision 136 . . December 5, 2001 11:22 pm by (logged).109.250.xxx [by definition, creationism is opposed to Darwinian evolution]
Revision 135 . . December 5, 2001 11:01 pm by Ed Poor [changed "which conflicts" to "sometimes held to conflict" -- depends on the variant of creationism. Some scientists in wiki say there's no conflict.]
Revision 134 . . December 5, 2001 12:47 pm by Egern
Revision 133 . . December 5, 2001 10:58 am by Simon J Kissane [make clearer that creationism is by definition opposed to Darwinian evolution]
Revision 132 . . December 5, 2001 10:55 am by Simon J Kissane [Darwinian evolution and creationism by definition incompatible; expand on deism]
Revision 131 . . (edit) December 5, 2001 6:32 am by Zundark [remove mislink]
Revision 130 . . December 5, 2001 6:31 am by Egern
Revision 129 . . December 5, 2001 6:19 am by Egern
Revision 128 . . December 5, 2001 6:05 am by Lee Daniel Crocker [Removed silly "Comentary" page]
Revision 127 . . December 5, 2001 6:01 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
Revision 126 . . December 5, 2001 5:20 am by Egern [Mention process theology]
Revision 125 . . December 5, 2001 4:56 am by Ed Poor [ID not considered a scientific explanation. ID's claim to be scientific belongs in ID article, and will disputed expertly, okay, LDC?]
Revision 124 . . December 5, 2001 4:53 am by Ed Poor [ID not only belief that God guided evolution: added "as in"]
Revision 123 . . December 5, 2001 4:48 am by Ed Poor [disclaimer seems excessively scrupulous: " . . . , although there is little more than anecdotal information supporting how widely the non-creationist views are held"]
Revision 122 . . December 5, 2001 4:46 am by Ed Poor [attempt to incorporate (some) creationist acceptance of (some) evolution]
Revision 121 . . (edit) December 5, 2001 4:38 am by Ed Poor
Revision 120 . . (edit) December 5, 2001 4:37 am by Ed Poor
Revision 119 . . December 5, 2001 4:35 am by Ed Poor [Removed redundant sentence -- terminology introduced in prev. parag.]
Revision 118 . . (edit) December 5, 2001 4:32 am by Ed Poor
Revision 117 . . December 5, 2001 2:23 am by Ed Poor [Trying for truce in evolution vs. creationism terminology]
Revision 116 . . December 5, 2001 2:20 am by Ed Poor [first of many copyedits, trying for NPOV (but pls undo any bias I insert)]
Revision 115 . . December 4, 2001 2:29 am by Dmerrill [link both ID and IDT]
Revision 114 . . December 4, 2001 2:27 am by Dmerrill [fix link]
Revision 113 . . December 4, 2001 2:04 am by Lee Daniel Crocker [Minor tweaks...]
Revision 112 . . December 4, 2001 1:58 am by Dmerrill [+data from another poll of 480,000 scientists reported in Newsweek]
Revision 111 . . December 4, 2001 1:22 am by (logged).109.250.xxx [Ed: please respond to what i said in /Talk before you delete fundamentalist bit -- and most of the stuff you deleted is no more anecdotal than the stuff you kept]
Revision 110 . . December 4, 2001 1:19 am by Ed Poor [removed anecdotal references pending better documentation, and removed 'fundamentalist' because it's a put down and also not true. See [[Evolution Poll]].]
Revision 109 . . December 4, 2001 1:13 am by (logged).109.250.xxx [restore appelation fundamentalist -- see /Talk for explanation]
Revision 108 . . December 4, 2001 1:13 am by (logged).109.250.xxx [whether most Americans support creationism or evolution depends on how one interprets evidence]
Revision 107 . . December 4, 2001 1:09 am by Ed Poor [copy-edits, removal of anti-creationist bias]
Revision 106 . . (edit) December 4, 2001 1:06 am by Ed Poor
Revision 105 . . (edit) December 4, 2001 1:06 am by Ed Poor
Revision 104 . . December 4, 2001 1:04 am by Ed Poor [5 out of 11 creationists aren't literalists -- compare intelligent design]
Revision 103 . . December 4, 2001 12:58 am by Ed Poor [removed 'fundamentalist' -- not all creationists are fundamentalists, unless 87% of Americans are fundamentalists]
Revision 102 . . December 4, 2001 12:56 am by Ed Poor [restored original paragraph, moved quibble to /talk]
Revision 101 . . December 4, 2001 12:27 am by (logged).109.250.xxx [whether majority of Americans support evolution, not creationism -- restore some other changes]
Revision 100 . . December 4, 2001 12:19 am by Ed Poor [subheadings and copyediting. Please check whether I injected NPOV or my personal bias]
Revision 99 . . (edit) December 4, 2001 12:08 am by (logged).191.188.xxx
Revision 98 . . (edit) December 4, 2001 12:05 am by (logged).191.188.xxx
Revision 97 . . (edit) December 3, 2001 11:54 pm by Ed Poor
Revision 96 . . (edit) December 3, 2001 11:52 pm by Ed Poor
Revision 95 . . December 3, 2001 11:52 pm by Ed Poor [copy editing - first in a series]
Revision 94 . . December 1, 2001 10:33 pm by The Anome [added Islam to list of traditional creationists]
Revision 93 . . December 1, 2001 10:22 pm by (logged).109.250.xxx [delete reference to papal infalliability; see /Talk]
Revision 92 . . (edit) December 1, 2001 8:46 pm by (logged).68.87.xxx
Revision 91 . . (edit) December 1, 2001 11:56 am by Ed Poor
Revision 90 . . December 1, 2001 10:04 am by Ed Poor
Revision 89 . . December 1, 2001 10:03 am by (logged).132.75.xxx [further clarify non-US paragraph - Ed, is this one OK?]
Revision 88 . . (edit) December 1, 2001 10:02 am by Ed Poor
Revision 87 . . December 1, 2001 10:01 am by Ed Poor [reordered para]
Revision 86 . . December 1, 2001 10:00 am by ManningBartlett [slight tweaks of LDC's text, no real changes]
Revision 85 . . December 1, 2001 9:59 am by Ed Poor [confused "creationist" with "sudden creationist", I guess]
Revision 84 . . December 1, 2001 9:58 am by Ed Poor [That's 47%, not 45% as long as we're being picky...]
Revision 83 . . December 1, 2001 9:57 am by (logged).132.75.xxx [try to characterise non-US position on creationism - hopefully not too controversially]
Revision 82 . . December 1, 2001 9:53 am by Lee Daniel Crocker [Better, but why paraphrase at all when you can quote directly, simply, and honestly?]
Revision 81 . . December 1, 2001 9:46 am by Ed Poor [Okay, this is the closest paraphrase I can come up with. If readers want the exact phrasing of the questions asked, let them click on the links.]
Revision 80 . . December 1, 2001 9:40 am by ManningBartlett [reinstated revision 75 - the new headings ruined the NPOV tone of the article. ]
Revision 79 . . December 1, 2001 9:34 am by Lee Daniel Crocker [If you're going to quote the poll, quote it correctly!]
Revision 78 . . December 1, 2001 9:25 am by Ed Poor [reordered 2nd/3rd paragraphs. What is believed is more important than how many believe it]
Revision 77 . . December 1, 2001 7:21 am by Ed Poor
Revision 76 . . December 1, 2001 7:19 am by Ed Poor [added HTMS headers for 3 part critique. Article is 3/4 rebuttal!!]
Revision 75 . . December 1, 2001 7:13 am by Lee Daniel Crocker [Corrected description of poll results.]
Revision 74 . . December 1, 2001 7:10 am by ManningBartlett [removed the "outside of the USA" counterclaim, until we have some data]
Revision 73 . . December 1, 2001 7:06 am by Ed Poor
Revision 72 . . December 1, 2001 7:05 am by Ed Poor
Revision 71 . . December 1, 2001 6:50 am by Ed Poor
Revision 70 . . December 1, 2001 6:48 am by Ed Poor [poll said Americans, not just Christians]
Revision 69 . . December 1, 2001 12:50 am by (logged).191.188.xxx [Can we get more non-USA input here? Thanks]
Revision 68 . . December 1, 2001 12:42 am by Ed Poor
Revision 67 . . December 1, 2001 12:29 am by Ed Poor
Revision 66 . . (edit) December 1, 2001 12:27 am by Ed Poor
Revision 65 . . (edit) December 1, 2001 12:25 am by Ed Poor
Revision 64 . . (edit) December 1, 2001 12:24 am by Ed Poor
Revision 63 . . December 1, 2001 12:21 am by Ed Poor
Revision 62 . . December 1, 2001 12:19 am by Ed Poor
Revision 61 . . December 1, 2001 12:17 am by Ed Poor
Revision 60 . . November 30, 2001 6:55 am by Lee Daniel Crocker [Moving discussion again.]
Revision 59 . . November 30, 2001 6:51 am by Ed Poor
Revision 58 . . November 30, 2001 6:48 am by Ed Poor
Revision 57 . . November 30, 2001 6:35 am by Lee Daniel Crocker [Creationist thought is much more divided than you simple two schools, Ed. Cover them all, or at least don't make it sound like that's all there is.]
Revision 56 . . November 30, 2001 6:32 am by Ed Poor
Revision 55 . . November 30, 2001 6:28 am by Ed Poor
Revision 54 . . November 30, 2001 6:25 am by Ed Poor
Revision 53 . . November 30, 2001 3:37 am by Dmerrill [copyedit, please check the paragraph containing "6,000 years" which I added to ensure I maintained npov. I tried. :-)]
Revision 52 . . (edit) November 30, 2001 2:18 am by Ed Poor
Revision 51 . . November 30, 2001 2:17 am by Ed Poor
Revision 50 . . November 30, 2001 2:17 am by Ed Poor
Revision 49 . . (edit) November 30, 2001 2:06 am by (logged).128.164.xxx [linked Intleligent Design]
Revision 48 . . (edit) November 30, 2001 2:02 am by Ed Poor
Revision 47 . . November 30, 2001 2:01 am by Ed Poor
Revision 46 . . (edit) November 30, 2001 1:58 am by Ed Poor
Revision 45 . . November 30, 2001 1:40 am by Ed Poor
Revision 44 . . November 30, 2001 1:36 am by Lee Daniel Crocker [Moving commentary to Talk page]
Revision 43 . . (edit) November 30, 2001 1:31 am by Ed Poor
Revision 42 . . November 30, 2001 1:31 am by Ed Poor
Revision 41 . . (edit) November 30, 2001 12:31 am by Ed Poor
Revision 40 . . November 30, 2001 12:30 am by Ed Poor
Revision 39 . . (edit) November 28, 2001 9:46 pm by (logged).191.188.xxx
Revision 38 . . (edit) November 28, 2001 9:42 pm by (logged).191.188.xxx
Revision 37 . . (edit) November 28, 2001 9:42 pm by (logged).191.188.xxx
Revision 36 . . November 28, 2001 2:21 pm by (logged).109.250.xxx [rewrite]
Revision 35 . . November 27, 2001 8:22 pm by The Anome [-> 'supreme being', ' Judeo-Christian tradition', 'universe', etc. etc.]
Revision 34 . . November 22, 2001 5:08 am by Eob [Made clear in first sentence that creationism is contrary to accepted science.]
Revision 33 . . November 22, 2001 5:05 am by Eob [Re-ordered para 2, 3, 4 to make read properly. Otherwise para 2 and 3 were assuming stuff in para 4 was above them.]
Revision 32 . . October 20, 2001 1:58 am by Lee Daniel Crocker ["Created kinds"]