Revision 153 . . December 17, 2001 6:04 pm by Ed Poor [okay, so I'll move the 'difficult to say' sentence up] Revision 152 . . December 17, 2001 6:04 pm by Ed Poor [okay, so I'll move the 'difficult to say' sentence up] Revision 151 . . December 17, 2001 6:00 pm by Simon J Kissane [creationism contradicts Darwinian evolution by definition... if you fully and completely accept Darwinian evolution, you are not a creationist] Revision 150 . . December 17, 2001 5:46 pm by Ed Poor [in contradiction to => generally held to contradict ] Revision 149 . . (edit) December 14, 2001 11:28 pm by AxelBoldt Revision 148 . . December 14, 2001 10:38 pm by (logged).253.39.xxx [Mentioned Gosse and the Omphalos] Revision 147 . . December 14, 2001 7:03 pm by Ed Poor [copy edit, combined and shortened 2 sentences] Revision 146 . . December 14, 2001 1:08 am by Ed Poor [added links] Revision 145 . . December 13, 2001 6:15 pm by Larry Sanger [Adding a question I hope someone will finally answer.] Revision 144 . . December 13, 2001 6:14 pm by Larry Sanger [Adding bit about cosmogony. Also "creationism" need not be capitalized.] Revision 143 . . December 13, 2001 6:03 pm by AxelBoldt [Hindus also have gods.] Revision 142 . . December 13, 2001 6:03 pm by AxelBoldt [Hindus also have gods.] Revision 141 . . December 13, 2001 6:03 pm by AxelBoldt [Hindus also have gods.] Revision 140 . . December 13, 2001 5:13 pm by Ed Poor [copy edit first para] Revision 139 . . December 13, 2001 7:14 am by Eloquence [added link to talkorigins.org] Revision 138 . . December 5, 2001 7:38 pm by (logged).158.193.xxx Revision 137 . . December 5, 2001 3:43 pm by (logged).109.250.xxx [changed "Others" to "Other people", to make sure it's not understood as "Other creationists"] Revision 136 . . December 5, 2001 3:22 pm by (logged).109.250.xxx [by definition, creationism is opposed to Darwinian evolution] Revision 135 . . December 5, 2001 3:01 pm by Ed Poor [changed "which conflicts" to "sometimes held to conflict" -- depends on the variant of creationism. Some scientists in wiki say there's no conflict.] Revision 134 . . December 5, 2001 4:47 am by Egern Revision 133 . . December 5, 2001 2:58 am by Simon J Kissane [make clearer that creationism is by definition opposed to Darwinian evolution] Revision 132 . . December 5, 2001 2:55 am by Simon J Kissane [Darwinian evolution and creationism by definition incompatible; expand on deism] Revision 131 . . (edit) December 4, 2001 10:32 pm by Zundark [remove mislink] Revision 130 . . December 4, 2001 10:31 pm by Egern Revision 129 . . December 4, 2001 10:19 pm by Egern Revision 128 . . December 4, 2001 10:05 pm by Lee Daniel Crocker [Removed silly "Comentary" page] Revision 127 . . December 4, 2001 10:01 pm by Lee Daniel Crocker Revision 126 . . December 4, 2001 9:20 pm by Egern [Mention process theology] Revision 125 . . December 4, 2001 8:56 pm by Ed Poor [ID not considered a scientific explanation. ID's claim to be scientific belongs in ID article, and will disputed expertly, okay, LDC?] Revision 124 . . December 4, 2001 8:53 pm by Ed Poor [ID not only belief that God guided evolution: added "as in"] Revision 123 . . December 4, 2001 8:48 pm by Ed Poor [disclaimer seems excessively scrupulous: " . . . , although there is little more than anecdotal information supporting how widely the non-creationist views are held"] Revision 122 . . December 4, 2001 8:46 pm by Ed Poor [attempt to incorporate (some) creationist acceptance of (some) evolution] Revision 121 . . (edit) December 4, 2001 8:38 pm by Ed Poor Revision 120 . . (edit) December 4, 2001 8:37 pm by Ed Poor Revision 119 . . December 4, 2001 8:35 pm by Ed Poor [Removed redundant sentence -- terminology introduced in prev. parag.] Revision 118 . . (edit) December 4, 2001 8:32 pm by Ed Poor Revision 117 . . December 4, 2001 6:23 pm by Ed Poor [Trying for truce in evolution vs. creationism terminology] Revision 116 . . December 4, 2001 6:20 pm by Ed Poor [first of many copyedits, trying for NPOV (but pls undo any bias I insert)] Revision 115 . . December 3, 2001 6:29 pm by Dmerrill [link both ID and IDT] Revision 114 . . December 3, 2001 6:27 pm by Dmerrill [fix link] Revision 113 . . December 3, 2001 6:04 pm by Lee Daniel Crocker [Minor tweaks...] Revision 112 . . December 3, 2001 5:58 pm by Dmerrill [+data from another poll of 480,000 scientists reported in Newsweek] Revision 111 . . December 3, 2001 5:22 pm by (logged).109.250.xxx [Ed: please respond to what i said in /Talk before you delete fundamentalist bit -- and most of the stuff you deleted is no more anecdotal than the stuff you kept] Revision 110 . . December 3, 2001 5:19 pm by Ed Poor [removed anecdotal references pending better documentation, and removed 'fundamentalist' because it's a put down and also not true. See [[Evolution Poll]].] Revision 109 . . December 3, 2001 5:13 pm by (logged).109.250.xxx [restore appelation fundamentalist -- see /Talk for explanation] Revision 108 . . December 3, 2001 5:13 pm by (logged).109.250.xxx [whether most Americans support creationism or evolution depends on how one interprets evidence] Revision 107 . . December 3, 2001 5:09 pm by Ed Poor [copy-edits, removal of anti-creationist bias] Revision 106 . . (edit) December 3, 2001 5:06 pm by Ed Poor Revision 105 . . (edit) December 3, 2001 5:06 pm by Ed Poor Revision 104 . . December 3, 2001 5:04 pm by Ed Poor [5 out of 11 creationists aren't literalists -- compare intelligent design] Revision 103 . . December 3, 2001 4:58 pm by Ed Poor [removed 'fundamentalist' -- not all creationists are fundamentalists, unless 87% of Americans are fundamentalists] Revision 102 . . December 3, 2001 4:56 pm by Ed Poor [restored original paragraph, moved quibble to /talk] Revision 101 . . December 3, 2001 4:27 pm by (logged).109.250.xxx [whether majority of Americans support evolution, not creationism -- restore some other changes] Revision 100 . . December 3, 2001 4:19 pm by Ed Poor [subheadings and copyediting. Please check whether I injected NPOV or my personal bias] Revision 99 . . (edit) December 3, 2001 4:08 pm by (logged).191.188.xxx Revision 98 . . (edit) December 3, 2001 4:05 pm by (logged).191.188.xxx Revision 97 . . (edit) December 3, 2001 3:54 pm by Ed Poor Revision 96 . . (edit) December 3, 2001 3:52 pm by Ed Poor Revision 95 . . December 3, 2001 3:52 pm by Ed Poor [copy editing - first in a series] Revision 94 . . December 1, 2001 2:33 pm by The Anome [added Islam to list of traditional creationists] Revision 93 . . December 1, 2001 2:22 pm by (logged).109.250.xxx [delete reference to papal infalliability; see /Talk] Revision 92 . . (edit) December 1, 2001 12:46 pm by (logged).68.87.xxx Revision 91 . . (edit) December 1, 2001 3:56 am by Ed Poor Revision 90 . . December 1, 2001 2:04 am by Ed Poor Revision 89 . . December 1, 2001 2:03 am by (logged).132.75.xxx [further clarify non-US paragraph - Ed, is this one OK?] Revision 88 . . (edit) December 1, 2001 2:02 am by Ed Poor Revision 87 . . December 1, 2001 2:01 am by Ed Poor [reordered para] Revision 86 . . December 1, 2001 2:00 am by ManningBartlett [slight tweaks of LDC's text, no real changes] Revision 85 . . December 1, 2001 1:59 am by Ed Poor [confused "creationist" with "sudden creationist", I guess] Revision 84 . . December 1, 2001 1:58 am by Ed Poor [That's 47%, not 45% as long as we're being picky...] Revision 83 . . December 1, 2001 1:57 am by (logged).132.75.xxx [try to characterise non-US position on creationism - hopefully not too controversially] Revision 82 . . December 1, 2001 1:53 am by Lee Daniel Crocker [Better, but why paraphrase at all when you can quote directly, simply, and honestly?] Revision 81 . . December 1, 2001 1:46 am by Ed Poor [Okay, this is the closest paraphrase I can come up with. If readers want the exact phrasing of the questions asked, let them click on the links.] Revision 80 . . December 1, 2001 1:40 am by ManningBartlett [reinstated revision 75 - the new headings ruined the NPOV tone of the article. ] Revision 79 . . December 1, 2001 1:34 am by Lee Daniel Crocker [If you're going to quote the poll, quote it correctly!] Revision 78 . . December 1, 2001 1:25 am by Ed Poor [reordered 2nd/3rd paragraphs. What is believed is more important than how many believe it] Revision 77 . . November 30, 2001 11:21 pm by Ed Poor Revision 76 . . November 30, 2001 11:19 pm by Ed Poor [added HTMS headers for 3 part critique. Article is 3/4 rebuttal!!] Revision 75 . . November 30, 2001 11:13 pm by Lee Daniel Crocker [Corrected description of poll results.] Revision 74 . . November 30, 2001 11:10 pm by ManningBartlett [removed the "outside of the USA" counterclaim, until we have some data] Revision 73 . . November 30, 2001 11:06 pm by Ed Poor Revision 72 . . November 30, 2001 11:05 pm by Ed Poor Revision 71 . . November 30, 2001 10:50 pm by Ed Poor Revision 70 . . November 30, 2001 10:48 pm by Ed Poor [poll said Americans, not just Christians] Revision 69 . . November 30, 2001 4:50 pm by (logged).191.188.xxx [Can we get more non-USA input here? Thanks] Revision 68 . . November 30, 2001 4:42 pm by Ed Poor Revision 67 . . November 30, 2001 4:29 pm by Ed Poor Revision 66 . . (edit) November 30, 2001 4:27 pm by Ed Poor Revision 65 . . (edit) November 30, 2001 4:25 pm by Ed Poor Revision 64 . . (edit) November 30, 2001 4:24 pm by Ed Poor Revision 63 . . November 30, 2001 4:21 pm by Ed Poor Revision 62 . . November 30, 2001 4:19 pm by Ed Poor Revision 61 . . November 30, 2001 4:17 pm by Ed Poor Revision 60 . . November 29, 2001 10:55 pm by Lee Daniel Crocker [Moving discussion again.] Revision 59 . . November 29, 2001 10:51 pm by Ed Poor Revision 58 . . November 29, 2001 10:48 pm by Ed Poor Revision 57 . . November 29, 2001 10:35 pm by Lee Daniel Crocker [Creationist thought is much more divided than you simple two schools, Ed. Cover them all, or at least don't make it sound like that's all there is.] Revision 56 . . November 29, 2001 10:32 pm by Ed Poor Revision 55 . . November 29, 2001 10:28 pm by Ed Poor Revision 54 . . November 29, 2001 10:25 pm by Ed Poor Revision 53 . . November 29, 2001 7:37 pm by Dmerrill [copyedit, please check the paragraph containing "6,000 years" which I added to ensure I maintained npov. I tried. :-)] Revision 52 . . (edit) November 29, 2001 6:18 pm by Ed Poor Revision 51 . . November 29, 2001 6:17 pm by Ed Poor Revision 50 . . November 29, 2001 6:17 pm by Ed Poor Revision 49 . . (edit) November 29, 2001 6:06 pm by (logged).128.164.xxx [linked Intleligent Design] Revision 48 . . (edit) November 29, 2001 6:02 pm by Ed Poor Revision 47 . . November 29, 2001 6:01 pm by Ed Poor Revision 46 . . (edit) November 29, 2001 5:58 pm by Ed Poor Revision 45 . . November 29, 2001 5:40 pm by Ed Poor Revision 44 . . November 29, 2001 5:36 pm by Lee Daniel Crocker [Moving commentary to Talk page] Revision 43 . . (edit) November 29, 2001 5:31 pm by Ed Poor Revision 42 . . November 29, 2001 5:31 pm by Ed Poor Revision 41 . . (edit) November 29, 2001 4:31 pm by Ed Poor Revision 40 . . November 29, 2001 4:30 pm by Ed Poor Revision 39 . . (edit) November 28, 2001 1:46 pm by (logged).191.188.xxx Revision 38 . . (edit) November 28, 2001 1:42 pm by (logged).191.188.xxx Revision 37 . . (edit) November 28, 2001 1:42 pm by (logged).191.188.xxx Revision 36 . . November 28, 2001 6:21 am by (logged).109.250.xxx [rewrite] Revision 35 . . November 27, 2001 12:22 pm by The Anome [-> 'supreme being', ' Judeo-Christian tradition', 'universe', etc. etc.] Revision 34 . . November 21, 2001 9:08 pm by Eob [Made clear in first sentence that creationism is contrary to accepted science.] Revision 33 . . November 21, 2001 9:05 pm by Eob [Re-ordered para 2, 3, 4 to make read properly. Otherwise para 2 and 3 were assuming stuff in para 4 was above them.] Revision 32 . . October 19, 2001 5:58 pm by Lee Daniel Crocker ["Created kinds"]
![[Home]](wikipedia.png)