[Home]History of Creationism

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 153 . . December 18, 2001 2:04 am by Ed Poor [okay, so I'll move the 'difficult to say' sentence up]
Revision 152 . . December 18, 2001 2:04 am by Ed Poor [okay, so I'll move the 'difficult to say' sentence up]
Revision 151 . . December 18, 2001 2:00 am by Simon J Kissane [creationism contradicts Darwinian evolution by definition... if you fully and completely accept Darwinian evolution, you are not a creationist]
Revision 150 . . December 18, 2001 1:46 am by Ed Poor [in contradiction to => generally held to contradict ]
Revision 149 . . (edit) December 15, 2001 7:28 am by AxelBoldt
Revision 148 . . December 15, 2001 6:38 am by (logged).253.39.xxx [Mentioned Gosse and the Omphalos]
Revision 147 . . December 15, 2001 3:03 am by Ed Poor [copy edit, combined and shortened 2 sentences]
Revision 146 . . December 14, 2001 9:08 am by Ed Poor [added links]
Revision 145 . . December 14, 2001 2:15 am by Larry Sanger [Adding a question I hope someone will finally answer.]
Revision 144 . . December 14, 2001 2:14 am by Larry Sanger [Adding bit about cosmogony. Also "creationism" need not be capitalized.]
Revision 143 . . December 14, 2001 2:03 am by AxelBoldt [Hindus also have gods.]
Revision 142 . . December 14, 2001 2:03 am by AxelBoldt [Hindus also have gods.]
Revision 141 . . December 14, 2001 2:03 am by AxelBoldt [Hindus also have gods.]
Revision 140 . . December 14, 2001 1:13 am by Ed Poor [copy edit first para]
Revision 139 . . December 13, 2001 3:14 pm by Eloquence [added link to talkorigins.org]
Revision 138 . . December 6, 2001 3:38 am by (logged).158.193.xxx
Revision 137 . . December 5, 2001 11:43 pm by (logged).109.250.xxx [changed "Others" to "Other people", to make sure it's not understood as "Other creationists"]
Revision 136 . . December 5, 2001 11:22 pm by (logged).109.250.xxx [by definition, creationism is opposed to Darwinian evolution]
Revision 135 . . December 5, 2001 11:01 pm by Ed Poor [changed "which conflicts" to "sometimes held to conflict" -- depends on the variant of creationism. Some scientists in wiki say there's no conflict.]
Revision 134 . . December 5, 2001 12:47 pm by Egern
Revision 133 . . December 5, 2001 10:58 am by Simon J Kissane [make clearer that creationism is by definition opposed to Darwinian evolution]
Revision 132 . . December 5, 2001 10:55 am by Simon J Kissane [Darwinian evolution and creationism by definition incompatible; expand on deism]
Revision 131 . . (edit) December 5, 2001 6:32 am by Zundark [remove mislink]
Revision 130 . . December 5, 2001 6:31 am by Egern
Revision 129 . . December 5, 2001 6:19 am by Egern
Revision 128 . . December 5, 2001 6:05 am by Lee Daniel Crocker [Removed silly "Comentary" page]
Revision 127 . . December 5, 2001 6:01 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
Revision 126 . . December 5, 2001 5:20 am by Egern [Mention process theology]
Revision 125 . . December 5, 2001 4:56 am by Ed Poor [ID not considered a scientific explanation. ID's claim to be scientific belongs in ID article, and will disputed expertly, okay, LDC?]
Revision 124 . . December 5, 2001 4:53 am by Ed Poor [ID not only belief that God guided evolution: added "as in"]
Revision 123 . . December 5, 2001 4:48 am by Ed Poor [disclaimer seems excessively scrupulous: " . . . , although there is little more than anecdotal information supporting how widely the non-creationist views are held"]
Revision 122 . . December 5, 2001 4:46 am by Ed Poor [attempt to incorporate (some) creationist acceptance of (some) evolution]
Revision 121 . . (edit) December 5, 2001 4:38 am by Ed Poor
Revision 120 . . (edit) December 5, 2001 4:37 am by Ed Poor
Revision 119 . . December 5, 2001 4:35 am by Ed Poor [Removed redundant sentence -- terminology introduced in prev. parag.]
Revision 118 . . (edit) December 5, 2001 4:32 am by Ed Poor
Revision 117 . . December 5, 2001 2:23 am by Ed Poor [Trying for truce in evolution vs. creationism terminology]
Revision 116 . . December 5, 2001 2:20 am by Ed Poor [first of many copyedits, trying for NPOV (but pls undo any bias I insert)]
Revision 115 . . December 4, 2001 2:29 am by Dmerrill [link both ID and IDT]
Revision 114 . . December 4, 2001 2:27 am by Dmerrill [fix link]
Revision 113 . . December 4, 2001 2:04 am by Lee Daniel Crocker [Minor tweaks...]
Revision 112 . . December 4, 2001 1:58 am by Dmerrill [+data from another poll of 480,000 scientists reported in Newsweek]
Revision 111 . . December 4, 2001 1:22 am by (logged).109.250.xxx [Ed: please respond to what i said in /Talk before you delete fundamentalist bit -- and most of the stuff you deleted is no more anecdotal than the stuff you kept]
Revision 110 . . December 4, 2001 1:19 am by Ed Poor [removed anecdotal references pending better documentation, and removed 'fundamentalist' because it's a put down and also not true. See [[Evolution Poll]].]
Revision 109 . . December 4, 2001 1:13 am by (logged).109.250.xxx [restore appelation fundamentalist -- see /Talk for explanation]
Revision 108 . . December 4, 2001 1:13 am by (logged).109.250.xxx [whether most Americans support creationism or evolution depends on how one interprets evidence]
Revision 107 . . December 4, 2001 1:09 am by Ed Poor [copy-edits, removal of anti-creationist bias]
Revision 106 . . (edit) December 4, 2001 1:06 am by Ed Poor
Revision 105 . . (edit) December 4, 2001 1:06 am by Ed Poor
Revision 104 . . December 4, 2001 1:04 am by Ed Poor [5 out of 11 creationists aren't literalists -- compare intelligent design]
Revision 103 . . December 4, 2001 12:58 am by Ed Poor [removed 'fundamentalist' -- not all creationists are fundamentalists, unless 87% of Americans are fundamentalists]
Revision 102 . . December 4, 2001 12:56 am by Ed Poor [restored original paragraph, moved quibble to /talk]
Revision 101 . . December 4, 2001 12:27 am by (logged).109.250.xxx [whether majority of Americans support evolution, not creationism -- restore some other changes]
Revision 100 . . December 4, 2001 12:19 am by Ed Poor [subheadings and copyediting. Please check whether I injected NPOV or my personal bias]
Revision 99 . . (edit) December 4, 2001 12:08 am by (logged).191.188.xxx
Revision 98 . . (edit) December 4, 2001 12:05 am by (logged).191.188.xxx
Revision 97 . . (edit) December 3, 2001 11:54 pm by Ed Poor
Revision 96 . . (edit) December 3, 2001 11:52 pm by Ed Poor
Revision 95 . . December 3, 2001 11:52 pm by Ed Poor [copy editing - first in a series]
Revision 94 . . December 1, 2001 10:33 pm by The Anome [added Islam to list of traditional creationists]
Revision 93 . . December 1, 2001 10:22 pm by (logged).109.250.xxx [delete reference to papal infalliability; see /Talk]
Revision 92 . . (edit) December 1, 2001 8:46 pm by (logged).68.87.xxx
Revision 91 . . (edit) December 1, 2001 11:56 am by Ed Poor
Revision 90 . . December 1, 2001 10:04 am by Ed Poor
Revision 89 . . December 1, 2001 10:03 am by (logged).132.75.xxx [further clarify non-US paragraph - Ed, is this one OK?]
Revision 88 . . (edit) December 1, 2001 10:02 am by Ed Poor
Revision 87 . . December 1, 2001 10:01 am by Ed Poor [reordered para]
Revision 86 . . December 1, 2001 10:00 am by ManningBartlett [slight tweaks of LDC's text, no real changes]
Revision 85 . . December 1, 2001 9:59 am by Ed Poor [confused "creationist" with "sudden creationist", I guess]
Revision 84 . . December 1, 2001 9:58 am by Ed Poor [That's 47%, not 45% as long as we're being picky...]
Revision 83 . . December 1, 2001 9:57 am by (logged).132.75.xxx [try to characterise non-US position on creationism - hopefully not too controversially]
Revision 82 . . December 1, 2001 9:53 am by Lee Daniel Crocker [Better, but why paraphrase at all when you can quote directly, simply, and honestly?]
Revision 81 . . December 1, 2001 9:46 am by Ed Poor [Okay, this is the closest paraphrase I can come up with. If readers want the exact phrasing of the questions asked, let them click on the links.]
Revision 80 . . December 1, 2001 9:40 am by ManningBartlett [reinstated revision 75 - the new headings ruined the NPOV tone of the article. ]
Revision 79 . . December 1, 2001 9:34 am by Lee Daniel Crocker [If you're going to quote the poll, quote it correctly!]
Revision 78 . . December 1, 2001 9:25 am by Ed Poor [reordered 2nd/3rd paragraphs. What is believed is more important than how many believe it]
Revision 77 . . December 1, 2001 7:21 am by Ed Poor
Revision 76 . . December 1, 2001 7:19 am by Ed Poor [added HTMS headers for 3 part critique. Article is 3/4 rebuttal!!]
Revision 75 . . December 1, 2001 7:13 am by Lee Daniel Crocker [Corrected description of poll results.]
Revision 74 . . December 1, 2001 7:10 am by ManningBartlett [removed the "outside of the USA" counterclaim, until we have some data]
Revision 73 . . December 1, 2001 7:06 am by Ed Poor
Revision 72 . . December 1, 2001 7:05 am by Ed Poor
Revision 71 . . December 1, 2001 6:50 am by Ed Poor
Revision 70 . . December 1, 2001 6:48 am by Ed Poor [poll said Americans, not just Christians]
Revision 69 . . December 1, 2001 12:50 am by (logged).191.188.xxx [Can we get more non-USA input here? Thanks]
Revision 68 . . December 1, 2001 12:42 am by Ed Poor
Revision 67 . . December 1, 2001 12:29 am by Ed Poor
Revision 66 . . (edit) December 1, 2001 12:27 am by Ed Poor
Revision 65 . . (edit) December 1, 2001 12:25 am by Ed Poor
Revision 64 . . (edit) December 1, 2001 12:24 am by Ed Poor
Revision 63 . . December 1, 2001 12:21 am by Ed Poor
Revision 62 . . December 1, 2001 12:19 am by Ed Poor
Revision 61 . . December 1, 2001 12:17 am by Ed Poor
Revision 60 . . November 30, 2001 6:55 am by Lee Daniel Crocker [Moving discussion again.]
Revision 59 . . November 30, 2001 6:51 am by Ed Poor
Revision 58 . . November 30, 2001 6:48 am by Ed Poor
Revision 57 . . November 30, 2001 6:35 am by Lee Daniel Crocker [Creationist thought is much more divided than you simple two schools, Ed. Cover them all, or at least don't make it sound like that's all there is.]
Revision 56 . . November 30, 2001 6:32 am by Ed Poor
Revision 55 . . November 30, 2001 6:28 am by Ed Poor
Revision 54 . . November 30, 2001 6:25 am by Ed Poor
Revision 53 . . November 30, 2001 3:37 am by Dmerrill [copyedit, please check the paragraph containing "6,000 years" which I added to ensure I maintained npov. I tried. :-)]
Revision 52 . . (edit) November 30, 2001 2:18 am by Ed Poor
Revision 51 . . November 30, 2001 2:17 am by Ed Poor
Revision 50 . . November 30, 2001 2:17 am by Ed Poor
Revision 49 . . (edit) November 30, 2001 2:06 am by (logged).128.164.xxx [linked Intleligent Design]
Revision 48 . . (edit) November 30, 2001 2:02 am by Ed Poor
Revision 47 . . November 30, 2001 2:01 am by Ed Poor
Revision 46 . . (edit) November 30, 2001 1:58 am by Ed Poor
Revision 45 . . November 30, 2001 1:40 am by Ed Poor
Revision 44 . . November 30, 2001 1:36 am by Lee Daniel Crocker [Moving commentary to Talk page]
Revision 43 . . (edit) November 30, 2001 1:31 am by Ed Poor
Revision 42 . . November 30, 2001 1:31 am by Ed Poor
Revision 41 . . (edit) November 30, 2001 12:31 am by Ed Poor
Revision 40 . . November 30, 2001 12:30 am by Ed Poor
Revision 39 . . (edit) November 28, 2001 9:46 pm by (logged).191.188.xxx
Revision 38 . . (edit) November 28, 2001 9:42 pm by (logged).191.188.xxx
Revision 37 . . (edit) November 28, 2001 9:42 pm by (logged).191.188.xxx
Revision 36 . . November 28, 2001 2:21 pm by (logged).109.250.xxx [rewrite]
Revision 35 . . November 27, 2001 8:22 pm by The Anome [-> 'supreme being', ' Judeo-Christian tradition', 'universe', etc. etc.]
Revision 34 . . November 22, 2001 5:08 am by Eob [Made clear in first sentence that creationism is contrary to accepted science.]
Revision 33 . . November 22, 2001 5:05 am by Eob [Re-ordered para 2, 3, 4 to make read properly. Otherwise para 2 and 3 were assuming stuff in para 4 was above them.]
Revision 32 . . October 20, 2001 1:58 am by Lee Daniel Crocker ["Created kinds"]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (author diff)

Changed: 1c1
The term creationism describes beliefs that animal and plant species were created through supernatural means, in contradiction to the Darwinian theory of evolution accepted by science. Due to imprecise and shifting use of the terms evolution and creationism it is difficult to say definitively whether "creationists" believe in "evolution" or not.
The term creationism describes beliefs that animal and plant species were created through supernatural means, in contradiction to the Darwinian theory of evolution accepted by science.

Changed: 3c3
Most creationists believe that no evolution took place at all; many others accept some kind of evolution but attribute it to divine intervention, as in Christianity, Judaism, Islam and Hinduism.
Due to imprecise and shifting use of the terms evolution and creationism it is difficult to say definitively whether "creationists" believe in "evolution" or not. Most creationists believe that no evolution took place at all; many others accept some kind of evolution but attribute it to divine intervention, as in Christianity, Judaism, Islam and Hinduism.

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: