Anyway, I think this page makes very little sense as it is, and needs to be moved to commentary. Even as commentary, it needs to be radically altered to be of much use. Perhaps a multi dimensional matrix would allow you to separate our the different questions. But since I think most of the questions don't lend themselves to a scalar representation, since they present only a small number of possible answers, which are distinct and non-contiguous. In other words: either god exists, or he does not; either there's either one god or there are many gods; either god is defined as a non-contingent being, or he is not. |
Anyway, I think this page makes very little sense as it is, and needs to be moved to commentary. Even as commentary, it needs to be radically altered to be of much use. Perhaps a multi dimensional matrix would allow you to separate our the different questions. But since I think most of the questions don't lend themselves to a scalar representation, since they present only a small number of possible answers, which are distinct and non-contiguous. In other words: either god exists, or he does not; either there's either one god or there are many gods; either god is defined as a non-contingent being, or he is not. :...or there is no 'he', but... |
Unless I see a specific responce to the points made above, and in LMS's post, i'll be moving the text of this article to [wikipedia comentary]? tomorow (thursday October 17th). MRC |
Unless I see a specific responce to the points made above, and in LMS's post, i'll be moving the text of this article to Wikipedia commentary tomorow (thursday October 17th). MRC |