[Home]History of 1977/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 5 . . (edit) April 3, 2001 7:42 am by Neeklamy
Revision 3 . . April 3, 2001 1:54 am by (logged).207.223.xxx
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff)

Added: 47a48
The bulleted format is just a test of style, I did try indenting the headers but that looked worse.

Added: 48a50,56
As for information, well, there should be enough on each year page to make it read sensibly and contain a link to the real meaty page on the particular subject.

What would be bad is if each year page just ends up looking like some boring page of stats that hold together as real English .

Finally, with regards to what is valid to make it onto each page, well, I'd say "did it occur in the year in question?" "yes" "include it!" If the page shows a bunch of eclectric stuff that isn't mainstream knowledge, great! Bring on the obscure factoids, the more the merrier.

Above all, these pages should be FUN, if it doesn't raise a smile whilst you're reading the Year in Review pages, then it aint doing its job. --Neeklamy

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: