I'm leaving this in the article, because I'm sure it says something true, but strictly speaking, it looks perfectly meaningless to me: "Oregonians are proud of their state's wealth of beautiful forests and streams, and place great importance on proper use of their environment, yet struggle to balance this need with the desire to achieve progress." Making generalizations about all Oregonians is appropriate for politicians but not encyclopedists. --LMS |
I'm leaving this in the article, because I'm sure it says something true, but strictly speaking, it looks perfectly meaningless to me: "Oregonians are proud of their state's wealth of beautiful forests and streams, and place great importance on proper use of their environment, yet struggle to balance this need with the desire to achieve progress." Making generalizations about all Oregonians is appropriate for politicians but not encyclopedists. --LMS Larry, you're being needlessly picky and rude again. Go bug Nevada. This passage is just a general gloss over issues that are very central to the state (environmentalism and logging, among others), that probably deserve further treatment but I don't feel like writing about it. -- BryceHarrington |
I'm not sure how to integrate it into the article without creating a big mess :-)
This passage is just a general gloss over issues that are very central to the state (environmentalism and logging, among others), that probably deserve further treatment but I don't feel like writing about it.