[Home]Logical fallacy/Appeal to authority

HomePage | Logical fallacy | Recent Changes | Preferences

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 1a2,4

Citing a person who is a recognized authority in the field is likely to carry more weight, and deservedly so.
But this is still strictly speaking a logical fallacy, especially when the question itself is a matter of opinion or a question of some controversy. While experts are less likely to be mistaken than others, it is not impossible or even uncommon.

A logical fallacy in which a person presenting a position on a subject mentions an authority who also holds that position, but may not be an authority in that area. For instance, the statement "Arthur C. Clarke recently released a report showing it necessary to floss three times daily" would be unlikely to impress many people, as Arthur C. Clarke is likely not an expert on [dental hygeine]?. Much of advertising relies on this logical fallacy, as well as on the /Bandwagon fallacy.

Citing a person who is a recognized authority in the field is likely to carry more weight, and deservedly so. But this is still strictly speaking a logical fallacy, especially when the question itself is a matter of opinion or a question of some controversy. While experts are less likely to be mistaken than others, it is not impossible or even uncommon.


HomePage | Logical fallacy | Recent Changes | Preferences
This page is read-only | View other revisions
Last edited May 19, 2001 12:35 pm by Lee Daniel Crocker (diff)
Search: