I second Micheal's request although I would like a reviewer from IELTS, if possible. I third it, although I've already removed the most misleading parts of the International English article. A reviewer from [IELTS] would be best, simply because that's what Aristotle wants. --Zundark, 2001 Sep 27 |
I third it, although I've already removed the most misleading parts of the International English article. A reviewer from [IELTS] would be best, simply because that's what ... wants. --Zundark, 2001 Sep 27 |
It is not pressing any longer. As Zundark has admitted he has already taken upon himself to act as he saw fit, unaware that requests for a review had been made. -- Aristotle :Aristotle, the way I see it 'requests for review' does not mean that we're calling in arbitrators, we're just hoping for some expertise. It's still wikipedia. --MichaelTinkler ::Rest assured that I'm happy for the page to be reviewed. I plan to write to various authorities myself and ask some etymology and English linguist history questions of some of the experts and organisations I've been tracking down and identifying. -- Aristotle Comments about the Provisional IRA and [neutral tone of voice]? in the Anti-Americanism/Talk page have shown that the Wikipedia could be said to be biased against the Provisional Irish Republican Army. I do see that bias myself, given the clear distinctions between the PIRA and the Irish Republican Army but I feel we should review this page to the emotive issues connected with The Troubles. |
:..., the way I see it 'requests for review' does not mean that we're calling in arbitrators, we're just hoping for some expertise. It's still wikipedia. --MichaelTinkler |
We should move this page to [Wikipedia article review requests]? or something like that. Other people can help me look for reviewers. :-) --LMS |
I am as expert as anyone on this topic, and I think the article here is quite good--indeed far better than I would expect any CS PhD to do. The "writing an applet" page is pretty useless and that link might be removed or totally rewritten, and much of the other pages on object orientation need a lot of work, but the Java page itself is fine. I suppose some sample code might be nice (such as that in the Forth article), and perhaps some detailed subpages on things like the API. Is that the kind of thing you think is missing here? --LDC
I third it, although I've already removed the most misleading parts of the International English article. A reviewer from [IELTS] would be best, simply because that's what ... wants. --Zundark, 2001 Sep 27