Please, erase the above comment [but see below] when the article is improved by someone who can improve it...something I lack the knowledge to do. --LMS]
Sure. I can revise it to the point of technical incomprehensibility, but I think a middle ground would be more appropriate. I have a problem: the links seem to be broken. I cannot get to any of them using mozilla on linux. This is a problem. Here is what I will do if I can get to it:
"top mathematicians in the field of mechanics" "dates from Stalinist USSR" "an early achievement is the [Kolmogorov-Arnold-Moser (KAM)]? theorem in dynamics" "known for string opinions, which can be found on the web (link?)" "his writing style mixes rigorous and abstract mathematics with informal, almost conversational prose"
Ok, I was able to get to the page and edit it. Let me know what you think. I am still having trouble getting to pages though. I had back up through the browser to get back here. The link on the page just gave me 404s.
Back again... using www.wikipedia.com works for relative links... the .org doesn't work so well. No big deal. Here is a suggestion though, before all these comments get whacked: The two writeups would make a dandy before/after example of how and how not to write for wikipedia. Since I wrote them both and would not be comfortable making that call. LMS: thanks for the edit. I really enjoy publishing in the peer-reviewed literature for the same reason. Almost all reviews, "good" or "bad" can be used for improvement!
No, I am not sure that "[Kolmogorov-Arnold-Moser (KAM)]?", is a good name for an article, but it will be an important article, whatever the name. Arnold is actually spelled Arnol'd, but that seems like it would be quite difficult also. How were the changes to the main page?