Naturalistic fallacy/Talk

It's interesting to note that [1] is just completely false--that's a definition of the "is-ought fallacy," due to Hume, not the naturalistic fallacy. Of course, they're very closely related conceptually, but they aren't the same thing. --Larry Sanger

It's alarming, actually. How could such a basic error crept into a (presumably) respectable reference book? --AV

They evidently didn't have a wiki. :-) --LMS