Is this page counting the rabbits from Watership Down in the category, then? Because they aren't anthropomorphic at all, just personified, which applies to an absolutely huge body of characters in folklore and literature I am guessing most people wouldn't include.
- Well, I disagree about them being anthropomorphic; they aren't physically different from normal rabbits, but they do talk to each other and exhibit a level of intelligence that is more humanlike than animallike. I guess they could be considered a border case, though. There's no hard and fast way of categorizing stuff "furry" and "non-furry", as with most purely culture-generated divisions.
My inclination is to not mention Watership Down -- if it is a questionable or debatable example, why not swap it for a better one? Our goal is not comprehensivity, is it? -- Cayzle
![[Home]](wikipedia.png)