[Home]Exponential function/Talk

HomePage | Exponential function | Recent Changes | Preferences

Aren't there multiple forms of the exponential function? Specifically, isn't the most general form kabx ? Admittedly, the differences can be incorporated in to b thus: kebxln(a), but wouldn't the first form be more clear to the laymen?


You don't really need the b; the most general form is kax. I mention these in the "science" paragraph; they are indeed the most useful to the "laymen". However they cannot be defined without exp(x) and in mathematics, exp(x) is tremendously more important than ax, so I started the article with exp(x) and then came to ax as soon as possible. --AxelBoldt

HomePage | Exponential function | Recent Changes | Preferences
This page is read-only | View other revisions
Last edited August 18, 2001 9:57 pm by AxelBoldt (diff)
Search: